Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250dvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)

C 250d

204 hp2143 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2014-2016

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.4 D5

215 hp2400 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2013-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d

Quickest 0-100 km/h
6.9 s
Fastest top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Highest torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Lightest
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
Lowest combined fuel consumption
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
Best estimated range
1,320 km
820 mi
Largest trunk
480 L
Best overall score
63/100
Best performance score
58/100
Best economy score
93/100
Best practicality score
74/100

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5

Most powerful
215 hp
160 kW
Best power-to-weight
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Power	204hp152kW	215hp160kW
Torque	500Nm369lb-ft	440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight	1,585kg3,494lb	1,605kg3,538lb
Gross weight	2,225kg4,905lb	2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed	240 km/h 149 mph	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated
To 99% top speed	65.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated	72.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	6.9s	7.6s
0-200 km/h	24.3s Calculated	26.9s Calculated
0-60 mph	6.6s Calculated	7.2s Calculated
Fuel consumption	5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK	5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK	8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK	4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile	14.8s Calculated	15.4s Calculated
Power-to-weight	129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated	134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated	274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	1,320km820mi Calculated	1,144km711mi Calculated
Displacement	2,143cc131cu in	2,400cc146cu in
Length	4,686mm184in	4,635mm182in
Width	1,810mm71in	1,865mm73in
Height	1,442mm57in	1,484mm58in
Wheelbase	2,840mm112in	2,776mm109in
Front track	1,588mm63in	1,588mm63in
Rear track	1,570mm62in	1,585mm62in
Ground clearance	92mm4in	136mm5in
Trunk volume	480L	380L
Doors	4	4
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	66L	68L
CO2 emissions	134g/km	-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250dVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	3,800 rpm	1,600-1,800 rpm	4,050 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5	4,000 rpm	1,500-3,000 rpm	5,200 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	6.6 s	7.2 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	6.9 s	7.6 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	24.3 s	26.9 s
Top speed	240 km/h 149 mph	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.6 s	2.8 s
330 ft 101 m	6.7 s	7.0 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.9 s	10.3 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.6 s	13.1 s
1/4 mile 402 m	14.8 s	15.4 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	162 km/h 100 mph	157 km/h 97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	204 hp 152 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5	215 hp 160 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has 11 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	500 Nm 369 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5	440 Nm 325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	1,585 kg 3,494 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5	1,605 kg 3,538 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	240 km/h 149 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	6.9 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5	7.6 s

Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5	5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5	134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	1,320 km 820 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5	1,144 km 711 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	204 hp 152 kW	6.9 s	240 km/h 149 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5	215 hp 160 kW	7.6 s	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d

Power	204 hp 152 kW
0-100 km/h	6.9 s
Top speed 240 km/h 149 mph

Doors/seats	4 doors 5 seats
Trunk	480 L 17.0 cu ft
Length	4,686 mm 184.5 in
Height	1,442 mm 56.8 in

VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5

Power	215 hp 160 kW
0-100 km/h	7.6 s
Top speed Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph

Doors/seats	4 doors 5 seats
Trunk	380 L 13.4 cu ft
Length	4,635 mm 182.5 in
Height	1,484 mm 58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d

Power	204 hp 152 kW
0-100 km/h	6.9 s
Top speed 240 km/h 149 mph

5.0 L/100 km

47.0 mpg US

56.5 mpg UK

VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5

Power	215 hp 160 kW
0-100 km/h	7.6 s
Top speed Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph

5.9 L/100 km

39.9 mpg US

47.9 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK	6.9 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5	5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK	7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d	129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp	5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5	134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp	5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d

VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5

Power

204 hp

152 kW

215 hp

160 kW

Torque

500 Nm

369 lb-ft

440 Nm

325 lb-ft

Acceleration

6.9 s

7.6 s

Top speed

240 km/h

149 mph

Unrestricted

240 km/h149 mph

Restricted

230 km/h143 mph

Lightness

1,585 kg

3,494 lb

1,605 kg

3,538 lb

Fuel consumption

5.0 L/100 km

47.0 mpg US

56.5 mpg UK

5.9 L/100 km

39.9 mpg US

47.9 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	4 doors 5 seats
Trunk	480 L 17.0 cu ft
Length	4,686 mm 184.5 in
Height	1,442 mm 56.8 in

Doors/seats	4 doors 5 seats
Trunk	380 L 13.4 cu ft
Length	4,635 mm 182.5 in
Height	1,484 mm 58.4 in

Range score

1,320 km

820 mi

1,144 km

711 mi

CO2 score

134 g/km

Trunk score

480 L

17.0 cu ft

380 L

13.4 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

129 hp/t

96 kW/t

7.8 kg/hp

134 hp/t

100 kW/t

7.5 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d	Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Consumption	5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK	5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	8.75 LC100 km	10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	14.08 LC100 mi	16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	750 L198 US gal165 UK gal	885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,313 LC/year	1,549 LC/year