Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250dvsMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
E 250 BlueTEC
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,320 km820 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 72.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.3s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,320km820mi Calculated | 1,180km733mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,474mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,598mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,614mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 92mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 490L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 59L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.3 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 6.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 1,320 km 820 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 1,180 km 733 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.9 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,320 km 820 mi | 1,180 km 733 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 140 km (87 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 BlueTEC
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























