Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200dvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
C 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful160 hp119 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,042 km647 mi
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t81 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160hp119kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,631kg3,596lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,341kg5,161lb | 2,135kg4,707lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 74.4s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.3s Calculated | 33.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 911km566mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,597cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 118g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 3,200 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 3,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | - | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 2,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.3 s | 33.6 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 160 hp 119 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 160 hp 119 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 1,631 kg 3,596 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 8.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 911 km 566 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.4 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.5 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 hp 119 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,631 kg 3,596 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 911 km 566 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 118 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 131 km (81 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200d
- Is 151 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























