Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200vsToyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014
2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions151 g/km
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score89/100
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best estimated range897 km558 mi
- Largest trunk506 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 181hp135kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 231Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.8s Calculated | 38.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 631km392mi Calculated | 897km558mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 2,494cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,850mm191in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 506L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 151g/km | 183g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
- Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.8 s | 38.3 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 3.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 11.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 181 hp 135 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 has 3 hp more than Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 231 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.6 s |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 631 km 392 mi |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 897 km 558 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.6 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 181 hp 135 kW | 9.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 181 hp 135 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 231 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 631 km 392 mi | 897 km 558 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 151 g/km | 183 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 506 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 | Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 69 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 32 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Has 267 km (166 mi) more estimated range
- Has 26 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























