Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T4vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)

C 200

184 hp1991 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,164 km
    723 mi
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200

  • Lightest
    1,390 kg
    3,064 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    132 hp/t
    99 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.9 mpg US
    38.3 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
Power
190hp142kW
184hp137kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,549kg3,415lb
1,390kg3,064lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
2,030kg4,475lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
69.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
65.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
25.7s
Calculated
25.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.9mpg US38.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton
Calculated
216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,164km723mi
Calculated
672km418mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,991cc121cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,686mm184in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,810mm71in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,442mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,840mm112in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,570mm62in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
92mm4in
Trunk volume
380L
480L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
41L
CO2 emissions-
136g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T44,700 rpm1,300-4,000 rpm6,000 rpm
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 2005,500 rpm1,200-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.7 s
25.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
184 hp
137 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
1,549 kg
3,415 lb
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
1,390 kg
3,064 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T47.2 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 2007.2 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
1,164 km
723 mi
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
672 km
418 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
184 hp
137 kW
7.2 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.2 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
Power
190 hp
142 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,549 kg
3,415 lb
1,390 kg
3,064 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
Range score
1,164 km
723 mi
672 km
418 mi
CO2 score
-
136 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 492 km (306 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200

  • Is 159 kg lighter
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 T4
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
2.0 T4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
2.0 T4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200
2.0 T4
C 200
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4vsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
C 200
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 vs Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster