Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t99 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.9 mpg US38.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions136 g/km
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score90/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best estimated range735 km457 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 2,215kg4,883lb | 2,030kg4,475lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 65.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.3s Calculated | 25.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.9mpg US38.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 735km457mi Calculated | 672km418mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.3 s | 25.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 8.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 735 km 457 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 672 km 418 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 735 km 457 mi | 672 km 418 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























