Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8vsTesla Model 3 · Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model 3 · Facelift 2020
Performance 80.5 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight304 hp/t226 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score80/100
Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.3 s
- Most powerful513 hp383 kW
- Largest trunk649 L
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 513hp383kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,928kg4,251lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,301kg5,073lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 305 km/h190 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 39.8s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 27.9s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 3.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.1s Calculated | 9.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 304hp/t226kW/t138hp/1000 lb Calculated | 266hp/t198kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 417Nm/t279lb-ft/ton Calculated | 342Nm/t229lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | - |
| Length | 4,757mm187in | 4,694mm185in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,426mm56in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,875mm113in |
| Front track | 1,609mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 92mm4in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 649L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 227g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 3.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.1 s | 9.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 305 km/h190 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 10.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 216 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 513 hp 383 kW |
Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8 and Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | Unrestricted 305 km/h190 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 261 km/h 162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 4.0 s |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 3.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 304 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 305 km/h190 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 513 hp 383 kW | 3.3 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 513 hp 383 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 3.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 305 km/h190 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 227 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 649 L 22.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 304 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 248 kg lighter
- Has 44 km/h (27 mph) higher top speed
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 214 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























