Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
C 300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Highest torque610 Nm450 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight293 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions160 g/km
- Best estimated range943 km586 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 610Nm450lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 2,185kg4,817lb | 2,195kg4,839lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 40.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 55.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.9s Calculated | 17.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 550km342mi Calculated | 943km586mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | - | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | - | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | - | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 280g/km | 160g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | - | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.9 s | 17.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 210 km/h 130 mph | 178 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | 258 hp 192 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 has 249 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 249 hp (186 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 5.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | 943 km 586 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | 258 hp 192 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 550 km 342 mi | 943 km 586 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 280 g/km | 160 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Has 249 hp more
- Has 240 Nm more
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Has 126 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 300
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Uses 5.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 393 km (244 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 120 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























