Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) · Facelift 2004 C 350 V6vsVolvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60
2.4i T5 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
- Lowest city consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,520kg3,351lb |
| Gross weight | 2,030kg4,475lb | 2,025kg4,464lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 63.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.9s Calculated | 20.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 620km385mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 2,401cc147cu in |
| Length | 4,526mm178in | 4,576mm180in |
| Width | 1,728mm68in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,428mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,493mm59in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,464mm58in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 424L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,034L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 5,500 rpm | 2,100 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.9 s | 20.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6 has 12 hp more than Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 6.4 s |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6 and Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS602.4i T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6 | VolvoS602.4i T5 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 620 km 385 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 C 350 V6
- Has 12 hp more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Volvo S60 2.4i T5 20V
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























