Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W210) · Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W210) · Facelift 1999
AMG E 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful354 hp264 kW
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.7 L/100 km14.1 mpg US16.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score76/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Best estimated range579 km359 mi
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 354hp264kW | 354hp264kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,115kg4,663lb | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 47.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 55.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 16.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK | 17.8L/100 km13.2mpg US15.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 539km335mi Calculated | 579km359mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,199cc195cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,528mm178in | 4,818mm190in |
| Width | 1,728mm68in | 1,799mm71in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,411mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,833mm112in |
| Front track | 1,493mm59in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,543mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 520L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 6,100 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 16.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 354 hp 264 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 539 km 335 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 579 km 359 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)AMG C 32 V6 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 354 hp 264 kW | 354 hp 264 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 539 km 335 mi | 579 km 359 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6 | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) AMG C 32 V6
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























