Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997
AMG C 43 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Highest torque610 Nm450 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight293 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions280 g/km
- Best estimated range550 km342 mi
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.5 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.1 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 610Nm450lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,185kg4,817lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 40.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 65.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.9s Calculated | 19.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 550km342mi Calculated | 530km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 4,266cc260cu in |
| Length | - | 4,516mm178in |
| Width | - | 1,723mm68in |
| Height | - | 1,387mm55in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,509mm59in |
| Rear track | - | 1,483mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 280g/km | 280g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 5,850 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 6,100 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.9 s | 19.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 210 km/h 130 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 306 hp 228 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 has 201 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 201 hp (150 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: 2.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 530 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 550 km 342 mi | 530 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 280 g/km | 280 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Has 201 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 2.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 98 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 km (12 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























