Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) · Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997
AMG C 43 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.5 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range530 km329 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,115kg4,663lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 47.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 65.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 19.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 521km324mi Calculated | 530km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 4,266cc260cu in |
| Length | 4,611mm182in | 4,516mm178in |
| Width | 1,744mm69in | 1,723mm68in |
| Height | 1,412mm56in | 1,387mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,507mm59in | 1,509mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,483mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 280g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 5,850 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 6,100 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 19.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 306 hp 228 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8 has 61 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8: 61 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 521 km 324 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 530 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004AMG C 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 521 km 324 mi | 530 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 280 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W203) Facelift 2004 AMG C 55 V8
- Has 61 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 km (6 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























