Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36vsNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Cedric (Y33)
3.0T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque385 Nm284 lb-ft
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 270hp201kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 368Nm271lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 25.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 620km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,606cc220cu in | 2,987cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,487mm177in | - |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | - |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | - |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | - |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
- Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 25.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 270 hp 201 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has 10 hp more than Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 and Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 270 hp 201 kW | 7.0 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 270 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 620 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 17 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























