Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) · Facelift 1994
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) · Facelift 1994 S 500 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
AMG C 36
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) Facelift 1994 S 500 V8
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)Facelift 1994S 500 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 385Nm284lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 2,650kg5,842lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.5s Calculated | 20.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,973cc303cu in | 3,606cc220cu in |
| Length | 5,113mm201in | 4,487mm177in |
| Width | 1,886mm74in | 1,720mm68in |
| Height | 1,486mm59in | 1,385mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 3,040mm120in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,606mm63in | 1,497mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,579mm62in | 1,478mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 525L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) Facelift 1994 S 500 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)Facelift 1994S 500 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)Facelift 1994S 500 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.5 s | 20.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)Facelift 1994S 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) Facelift 1994 S 500 V8 has 40 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 and Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) Facelift 1994 S 500 V8: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)Facelift 1994S 500 V8 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)Facelift 1994S 500 V8 | 2,000 kg 4,409 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)Facelift 1994S 500 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)Facelift 1994S 500 V8 | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) Facelift 1994 S 500 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 and Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) Facelift 1994 S 500 V8: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)Facelift 1994S 500 V8 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)Facelift 1994S 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)Facelift 1994S 500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)Facelift 1994S 500 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,000 kg 4,409 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) Facelift 1994 S 500 V8
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 85 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Is 440 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























