Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque385 Nm284 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Lowest city consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,520kg3,351lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,175kg4,795lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 73.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 29.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 594km369mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,606cc220cu in | 1,497cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,487mm177in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200 | - | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 29.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has 96 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 96 hp (72 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.1 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 594 km 369 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Has 96 hp more
- Has 105 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 58 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200
- Is 40 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























