Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque385 Nm284 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 28.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 631km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,606cc220cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,487mm177in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 28.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has 96 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 96 hp (72 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.6 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 631 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Has 96 hp more
- Has 85 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























