Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220dvsMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205)
C 250d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best performance score58/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | 2,165kg4,773lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.6s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 400L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 132g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.6 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 769 km 478 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.9 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 132 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 231 km (143 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























