Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200vsMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205)
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range704 km438 mi
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score88/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score50/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,520kg3,351lb |
| Gross weight | 2,270kg5,004lb | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 90.1s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.3s Calculated | 34.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 704km438mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,826mm190in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,873mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 400L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 170g/km | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.3 s | 34.6 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 8.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 667 km 414 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 704 km 438 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.0 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.5 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 704 km 438 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 170 g/km | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200 | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 200
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 200
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 38 km (23 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























