Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) · Facelift 2016 SLC 180vsMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018 C 180 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018
C 180 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range1,034 km643 mi
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score91/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.6
- Best overall score47/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,955kg4,310lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.6s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 98.1s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.6s Calculated | 40.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,034km643mi Calculated | 612km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,595cc97cu in | 1,595cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,133mm163in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 88mm3in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | 152g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 5,300 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | - | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.6 s | 40.1 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 156 hp 116 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.6: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 1,034 km 643 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | 612 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 156 hp 116 kW | 7.9 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.5 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,034 km 643 mi | 612 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | 152 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180 | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 423 km (263 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 18 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























