Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8vsMercedes-Benz GLE Coupe (C167) · Facelift 2023 AMG GLE 63 S V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLE Coupe (C167) · Facelift 2023
AMG GLE 63 S V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight292 hp/t218 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score80/100
Mercedes-Benz GLE Coupe (C167) Facelift 2023 AMG GLE 63 S V8
- Most powerful612 hp456 kW
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
- Best estimated range669 km416 mi
- Largest trunk655 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 612hp456kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 850Nm627lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 2,430kg5,357lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 3,120kg6,878lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 305 km/h190 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.7s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 84.0s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.5s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 292hp/t218kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 252hp/t188kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 653km406mi Calculated | 669km416mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 2,018mm79in |
| Height | 1,401mm55in | 1,720mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,935mm116in |
| Front track | 1,636mm64in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,720mm68in |
| Ground clearance | 101mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 355L | 655L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,790L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 230g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLE Coupe (C167) Facelift 2023 AMG GLE 63 S V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 5,500-6,250 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | 5,750-6,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.5 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 305 km/h190 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 126 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | 612 hp 456 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLE Coupe (C167) Facelift 2023 AMG GLE 63 S V8 has 102 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8 and Mercedes-Benz GLE Coupe (C167) Facelift 2023 AMG GLE 63 S V8: 102 hp (76 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | 2,430 kg 5,357 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | Unrestricted 305 km/h190 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 3.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | 3.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLE Coupe (C167) Facelift 2023 AMG GLE 63 S V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8 and Mercedes-Benz GLE Coupe (C167) Facelift 2023 AMG GLE 63 S V8: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 653 km 406 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | 669 km 416 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 305 km/h190 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | 612 hp 456 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 612 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 305 km/h190 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 2,430 kg 5,357 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 653 km 406 mi | 669 km 416 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 230 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | 655 L 23.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8 | Mercedes-Benz GLE Coupe (C167) Facelift 2023 AMG GLE 63 S V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 S V8
- Is 685 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLE Coupe (C167) Facelift 2023 AMG GLE 63 S V8
- Has 102 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
- Has 300 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























