Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDIvsMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
C 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,375 km854 mi
- Largest trunk1,632 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.1s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 31.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,375km854mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,993cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,866mm192in | 4,755mm187in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,462mm58in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,582mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,632L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 126g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 31.5 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d and Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,375 km 854 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,375 km 854 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 126 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,632 L 57.6 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Is 225 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 661 km (411 mi) more estimated range
- Has 1,142 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























