Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220dvsSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain

C 220d

200 hp1993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-present
VS

Skoda Octavia IV Scout

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Lightest
    1,678 kg
    3,699 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    113 hp/t
    84 kW/t
    8.8 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    873 km
    542 mi
  • Largest trunk
    640 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d

  • Fastest top speed
    231 km/h
    144 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    440 Nm
    325 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dSkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
Power
200hp149kW
190hp142kW
Torque
440Nm325lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,800kg3,968lb
1,678kg3,699lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,190kg4,828lb
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
78.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
69.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
31.5s
Calculated
29.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
873km542mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,993cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,755mm187in
4,703mm185in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,829mm72in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,487mm59in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,680mm106in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,535mm60in
Rear track
1,582mm62in
1,533mm60in
Ground clearance-
161mm6in
Trunk volume
490L
640L
Max trunk volume
1,510L
1,700L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
40L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220dSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d4,200 rpm1,800-2,800 rpm4,450 rpm
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dSkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.5 s
29.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
155 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
200 hp
149 kW
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
1,800 kg
3,968 lb
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
1,678 kg
3,699 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
231 km/h
144 mph
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
229 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d7.8 s
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI7.2 s

Although Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d has more power, Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d and Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
714 km
444 mi
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
873 km
542 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
231 km/h
144 mph
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
229 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,703 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,487 mm
58.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
7.8 s
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dSkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.2 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
1,800 kg
3,968 lb
1,678 kg
3,699 lb
Fuel consumption
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,703 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,487 mm
58.5 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
873 km
542 mi
Trunk score
490 L
17.3 cu ft
640 L
22.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220dSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI
Consumption5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.80 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.77 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used840 L222 US gal185 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,470 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI

  • Is 122 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 159 km (99 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 150 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 220d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI
C 220d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI
C 220d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0 TSI
320d
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsBMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d
C 220d
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
C 220d
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d
2.0 TSI
CLA 220d
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220d
2.0 TSI
CLA 220d
VS
SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)Facelift 2023CLA 220d
C 220d
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d vs Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster