Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 250vsMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
C 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range917 km570 mi
- Best performance score54/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.0s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 77.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.7s Calculated | 31.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 917km570mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,993cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,766mm188in | 4,755mm187in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,582mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,510L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 5,000-6,100 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.7 s | 31.2 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 218 hp 163 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 has 18 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 7.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 917 km 570 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.1 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 917 km 570 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250
- Has 18 hp more
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 202 km (126 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























