Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250vsMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
C 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best estimated range862 km536 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score58/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.4s Calculated | 31.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 862km536mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,993cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,755mm187in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,582mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,510L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.4 s | 31.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250 has 11 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 6.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250 and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 862 km 536 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 862 km 536 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250 | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 395 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Has 90 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























