Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220dvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range745 km463 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 70.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 32.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 745km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,595cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,755mm187in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,582mm62in | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 127g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5,300 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 32.7 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d has 44 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 44 hp (33 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 7.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 714 km 444 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 745 km 463 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.2 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 745 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 127 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Has 44 hp more
- Has 190 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Is 480 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























