Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220dvsMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,475 kg3,252 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range976 km607 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,115kg4,663lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.1s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.0s Calculated | 29.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 976km607mi Calculated | 658km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,755mm187in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,582mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 92mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,510L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,400-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.0 s | 29.9 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 has 34 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 8.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 976 km 607 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 658 km 409 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.1 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 976 km 607 mi | 658 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 245 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 318 km (198 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Has 34 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























