Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 250vsSkoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III
RS 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range820 km509 mi
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score90/100
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest1,345 kg2,965 lb
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions142 g/km
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,345kg2,965lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 1,887kg4,160lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 80.6s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.9s Calculated | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 820km509mi Calculated | 806km501mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,359mm172in | 4,685mm184in |
| Width | 1,786mm70in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,449mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,549mm61in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 128mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 488L | 590L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,547L | 1,580L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 143g/km | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 250: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.9 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 250 and Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 248 km/h 154 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | 6.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
Although Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI has more power, Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | 820 km 509 mi |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.8 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W246)B 250 | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 820 km 509 mi | 806 km 501 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 143 g/km | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 488 L 17.2 cu ft | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 250 | Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W246) B 250
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 102 L more trunk volume
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























