Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)
55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed308 km/h191 mph
- Most powerful522 hp389 kW
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight321 hp/t240 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range565 km351 mi
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score76/100
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Largest trunk321 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 522hp389kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 670Nm494lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | - |
| Top speed | 308 km/h 191 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.8s99% target: 305 km/h / 189 mph Calculated | 61.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.3s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 321hp/t240kW/t146hp/1000 lb Calculated | 251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton Calculated | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 565km351mi Calculated | 496km308mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,551mm179in | 4,728mm186in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,984mm78in |
| Height | 1,260mm50in | 1,354mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,678mm66in | 1,683mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 96mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 165L | 321L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 675L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 262g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 1,900-5,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.3 s | 12.3 s |
| Top speed | 308 km/h 191 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 522 hp 389 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 has 46 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8: 46 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 670 Nm 494 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 3.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 321 hp/t 240 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 565 km 351 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 496 km 308 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 522 hp 389 kW | 3.8 s | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 3.9 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | 321 hp/t 240 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 522 hp 389 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 670 Nm 494 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 308 km/h 191 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 565 km 351 mi | 496 km 308 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 262 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 321 hp/t 240 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 24.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 3,701 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8
- Has 46 hp more
- Is 270 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 70 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 156 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























