Spyker C8 Preliator
Car comparison
Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40VvsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) · Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) · Facelift 2017
S 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed322 km/h200 mph
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight378 hp/t282 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score91/100
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8
- Highest torque670 Nm494 lb-ft
- Best overall score74/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 522hp389kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 670Nm494lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.6s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated | 56.9s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.0s Calculated | 10.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 378hp/t282kW/t171hp/1000 lb Calculated | 332hp/t248kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 432Nm/t289lb-ft/ton Calculated | 427Nm/t286lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 677km421mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,172cc255cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,628mm182in | 4,544mm179in |
| Width | 1,953mm77in | 2,075mm82in |
| Height | 1,202mm47in | 1,287mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | 1,684mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 96mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 120L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 224g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 6,800 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.0 s | 10.7 s |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 215 km/h 133 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 525 hp 391 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 522 hp 389 kW |
Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8 and Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 670 Nm 494 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 3.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 3.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 332 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 525 hp 391 kW | 3.7 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 522 hp 389 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 522 hp 389 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 670 Nm 494 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 677 km 421 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 224 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 332 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 180 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8
- Has 70 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























