Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 220
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz A-class (W177)
A 220
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,313 kg2,895 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range847 km527 mi
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 220
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,313kg2,895lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 1,898kg4,184lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 75.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.7s Calculated | 27.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 773km480mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,419mm174in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | 104mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 220: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | - | 1,800 rpm | 2,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.7 s | 27.7 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 1,313 kg 2,895 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 220 and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 220: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 847 km 527 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | 773 km 480 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 220 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 220 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,313 kg 2,895 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 773 km 480 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Is 117 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 75 km (46 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 220
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























