Mercedes-Benz A-class (W176) · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W176) · Facelift 2015 A 220vsSkoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,388 kg3,060 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,020 km634 mi
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W176) Facelift 2015 A 220
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,388kg3,060lb |
| Gross weight | 2,025kg4,464lb | 1,973kg4,350lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.9s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 78.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.6s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 848km527mi Calculated | 1,020km634mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,659mm183in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,433mm56in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,553mm61in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,512mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 93mm4in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 341L | 590L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,157L | 1,580L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz A-class (W176) Facelift 2015 A 220: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.6 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | 1,388 kg 3,060 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | 6.9 s |
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class (W176) Facelift 2015 A 220 and Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W176) Facelift 2015 A 220: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | 848 km 527 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | 1,020 km 634 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.9 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 220 | SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | 1,388 kg 3,060 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 848 km 527 mi | 1,020 km 634 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 341 L 12.0 cu ft | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz A-class (W176) Facelift 2015 A 220 | Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W176) Facelift 2015 A 220
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 37 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 172 km (107 mi) more estimated range
- Has 249 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























