Opel Astra H GTC
Car comparison
Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V TurbovsMercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz A-class (W169)
A 200 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range684 km425 mi
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,265 kg2,789 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 249Nm184lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,265kg2,789lb | 1,305kg2,877lb |
| Gross weight | 1,840kg4,057lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.0s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 88.4s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 36.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 559km347mi Calculated | 684km425mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,034cc124cu in |
| Length | 4,290mm169in | 3,838mm151in |
| Width | 1,753mm69in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,595mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,614mm103in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,488mm59in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,488mm59in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 435L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,995L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 223g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 5,400 rpm | 1,950 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 36.1 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW |
Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo and Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 249 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 1,265 kg 2,789 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 7.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo and Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 559 km 347 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 684 km 425 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW | 8.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelAstra H GTC2.0i 16V Turbo | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 249 Nm 184 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,265 kg 2,789 lb | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 559 km 347 mi | 684 km 425 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 223 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo | Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Astra H GTC 2.0i 16V Turbo
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
- Has 31 Nm more
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 124 km (77 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























