Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 TurbovsMercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz A-class (W177)
A 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 180
- Lightest1,290 kg2,844 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range705 km438 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 136hp101kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 200Nm148lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,305kg2,877lb | 1,290kg2,844lb |
| Gross weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.4s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 86.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.1s Calculated | 46.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 684km425mi Calculated | 705km438mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,034cc124cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 3,838mm151in | 4,419mm174in |
| Width | 1,764mm69in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,595mm63in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,568mm101in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 355L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,995L | 1,195L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 43L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | 5,500 rpm | 1,460-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.1 s | 46.2 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | 136 hp 101 kW |
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo has 57 hp more than Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 180 and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: 57 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | 200 Nm 148 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | 1,290 kg 2,844 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 8.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 180: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 180 and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | 105 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 684 km 425 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | 705 km 438 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW | 8.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | 136 hp 101 kW | 8.8 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | 105 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W177)A 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 136 hp 101 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 200 Nm 148 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | 1,290 kg 2,844 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 684 km 425 mi | 705 km 438 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo | Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
- Has 57 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W177) A 180
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 21 km (13 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























