Skoda Octavia II · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia II · Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz A-class (W169) · Facelift 2008 A 200 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz A-class (W169) · Facelift 2008
A 200 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk585 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) Facelift 2008 A 200 Turbo
- Lightest1,305 kg2,877 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,305kg2,877lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.9s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.4s Calculated | 36.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 684km425mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,034cc124cu in |
| Length | 4,569mm180in | 3,838mm151in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,462mm58in | 1,595mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,541mm61in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 585L | 435L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,455L | 1,995L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 54L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) Facelift 2008 A 200 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.4 s | 36.1 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW |
Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) Facelift 2008 A 200 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) Facelift 2008 A 200 Turbo and Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) Facelift 2008 A 200 Turbo: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 714 km 444 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | 684 km 425 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW | 8.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIFacelift 2009RS 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 684 km 425 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 585 L 20.7 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) Facelift 2008 A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia II Facelift 2009 RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) Facelift 2008 A 200 Turbo
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























