Peugeot 207
Car comparison
Peugeot 207 RC 1.6vsMercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz A-class (W169)
A 200 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 207 RC 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range694 km432 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score87/100
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot207RC 1.6 | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 174hp130kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,250kg2,756lb | 1,305kg2,877lb |
| Gross weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 76.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.2s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 694km432mi Calculated | 684km425mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 2,034cc124cu in |
| Length | 4,030mm159in | 3,838mm151in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,472mm58in | 1,595mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,475mm58in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,468mm58in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 270L | 435L |
| Max trunk volume | 923L | 1,995L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 171g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 207 RC 1.6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot207RC 1.6 | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.2 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 174 hp 130 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW |
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo has 19 hp more than Peugeot 207 RC 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 207 RC 1.6 and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 7.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.3 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo has more power, Peugeot 207 RC 1.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 207 RC 1.6 and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 207 RC 1.6 and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 694 km 432 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 684 km 425 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 174 hp 130 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Peugeot 207 RC 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot207RC 1.6 | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 174 hp 130 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 694 km 432 mi | 684 km 425 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 171 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 207 RC 1.6 | Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 207 RC 1.6
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 165 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























