Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200dvsMercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177)
A 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,042 km647 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160hp119kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,631kg3,596lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Gross weight | 2,341kg5,161lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 71.0s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.3s Calculated | 32.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 836km520mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,549mm179in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,446mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 104mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 405L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.3 s | 32.8 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 3.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 160 hp 119 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 163 hp 122 kW |
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200 has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d and Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 1,631 kg 3,596 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 8.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 8.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200 has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d and Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d and Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 836 km 520 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.4 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.6 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 hp 119 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,631 kg 3,596 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 836 km 520 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d | Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 206 km (128 mi) more estimated range
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 236 kg lighter
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























