Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180vsMercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177)
A 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 180
- Lightest1,305 kg2,877 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range754 km469 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 136hp101kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 200Nm148lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,305kg2,877lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 1,905kg4,200lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 69.7s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 38.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 104hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated | 153Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 615km382mi Calculated | 754km469mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,496cc91cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,549mm179in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,446mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 405L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 43L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | 5,500 rpm | 1,460-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 38.8 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 3.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 11.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | 136 hp 101 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 has 34 hp more than Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | 200 Nm 148 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 8.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 and Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 180: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 615 km 382 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | 754 km 469 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | 136 hp 101 kW | 8.9 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 136 hp 101 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 200 Nm 148 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 615 km 382 mi | 754 km 469 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 104 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 | Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 180
- Is 245 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 139 km (86 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























