McLaren 765LT
Car comparison
McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8vsPraga Bohema 3.8 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPraga Bohema
3.8 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Praga Bohema 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.3 s
- Lightest982 kg2,165 lb
- Best power-to-weight713 hp/t532 kW/t1.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score97/100
McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Most powerful765 hp570 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Specification comparison
| Model | McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | PragaBohema3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 765hp570kW | 700hp522kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 725Nm535lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,339kg2,952lb | 982kg2,165lb |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 35.4s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 25.5s99% target: 314 km/h / 195 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 2.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.2s | 5.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7s Calculated | 2.2s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 10.0s Calculated | 9.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 571hp/t426kW/t259hp/1000 lb Calculated | 713hp/t532kW/t323hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 597Nm/t400lb-ft/ton Calculated | 738Nm/t494lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,994cc244cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,600mm181in | 4,510mm178in |
| Width | 2,045mm81in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,159mm46in | 1,060mm42in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,770mm109in |
| Front track | 1,656mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,612mm63in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Praga Bohema 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
| PragaBohema3.8 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 3,000-6,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | PragaBohema3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.7 s | 2.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 2.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.2 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 28.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.7 s | 6.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.5 s | 7.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.0 s | 9.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 240 km/h 149 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 765 hp 570 kW |
| PragaBohema3.8 V6 | 700 hp 522 kW |
McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8 has 65 hp more than Praga Bohema 3.8 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Praga Bohema 3.8 V6 and McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8: 65 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| PragaBohema3.8 V6 | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 1,339 kg 2,952 lb |
| PragaBohema3.8 V6 | 982 kg 2,165 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| PragaBohema3.8 V6 | 317 km/h 197 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 2.8 s |
| PragaBohema3.8 V6 | 2.3 s |
Although McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8 has more power, Praga Bohema 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Praga Bohema 3.8 V6 and McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 571 hp/t 426 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp |
| PragaBohema3.8 V6 | 713 hp/t 532 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 765 hp 570 kW | 2.8 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| PragaBohema3.8 V6 | 700 hp 522 kW | 2.3 s | 317 km/h 197 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PragaBohema3.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | PragaBohema3.8 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 765 hp 570 kW | 700 hp 522 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 2.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 317 km/h 197 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,339 kg 2,952 lb | 982 kg 2,165 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 571 hp/t 426 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | 713 hp/t 532 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8
- Has 65 hp more
- Has 75 Nm more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Praga Bohema 3.8 V6
- Is 357 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 142 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























