Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156)
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted307 km/h191 mph Restricted
- Most powerful530 hp395 kW
- Highest torque710 Nm524 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions250 g/km
- Best estimated range748 km465 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Lightest1,730 kg3,814 lb
- Best power-to-weight293 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 710Nm524lb-ft | 610Nm450lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,185kg4,817lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 307 km/h191 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 40.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.1s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 279hp/t208kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated | 353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 748km465mi Calculated | 550km342mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,799cc232cu in | 6,208cc379cu in |
| Length | 5,262mm207in | - |
| Width | 1,948mm77in | - |
| Height | 1,481mm58in | - |
| Wheelbase | 3,171mm125in | - |
| Front track | 1,634mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,647mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 250g/km | 280g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | 6,500-6,800 rpm | 2,250-3,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.1 s | 10.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 307 km/h191 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | 530 hp 395 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8 has 23 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | 710 Nm 524 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 307 km/h191 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 4.2 s |
Although Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | 748 km 465 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 307 km/h191 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 710 Nm 524 lb-ft | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 307 km/h191 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 748 km 465 mi | 550 km 342 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 250 g/km | 280 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) GTS 3.8 V8
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 198 km (123 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























