Maserati Mexico
Car comparison
Maserati Mexico 4.2 V8vsMercedes-Benz W111 Coupe 280 SE 3.5 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz W111 Coupe
280 SE 3.5 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Mexico 4.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque373 Nm275 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score62/100
Mercedes-Benz W111 Coupe 280 SE 3.5 V8
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range631 km392 mi
- Best economy score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 373Nm275lb-ft | 286Nm211lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 98.4s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 104.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.6s Calculated | 43.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 500km311mi Calculated | 631km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,136cc252cu in | 3,499cc214cu in |
| Length | 4,760mm187in | 4,905mm193in |
| Width | 1,730mm68in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,350mm53in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,750mm108in |
| Front track | 1,390mm55in | 1,482mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,360mm54in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 680L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 95L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Mexico 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz W111 Coupe 280 SE 3.5 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | 5,000 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | 5,800 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.6 s | 43.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Maserati Mexico 4.2 V8 has 60 hp more than Mercedes-Benz W111 Coupe 280 SE 3.5 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz W111 Coupe 280 SE 3.5 V8 and Maserati Mexico 4.2 V8: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | 286 Nm 211 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Mexico 4.2 V8 and Mercedes-Benz W111 Coupe 280 SE 3.5 V8: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | 19.0 L/100 km 12.4 mpg US 14.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz W111 Coupe 280 SE 3.5 V8 and Maserati Mexico 4.2 V8: 6.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | 500 km 311 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | 631 km 392 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | 200 hp 149 kW | 9.0 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 |
| 19.0 L/100 km 12.4 mpg US 14.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 |
| 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Mexico 4.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | 19.0 L/100 km 12.4 mpg US 14.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 19.0 L/100 km 12.4 mpg US 14.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiMexico4.2 V8 | Mercedes-BenzW111 Coupe280 SE 3.5 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | 286 Nm 211 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 19.0 L/100 km 12.4 mpg US 14.9 mpg UK | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 500 km 311 mi | 631 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Mexico 4.2 V8 | Mercedes-Benz W111 Coupe 280 SE 3.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 19 L/100 km12.4 mpg US14.9 mpg UK | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 33.25 LC100 km | 22.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 53.51 LC100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,850 L753 US gal627 UK gal | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,988 LC/year | 3,413 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Mexico 4.2 V8
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 87 Nm more
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz W111 Coupe 280 SE 3.5 V8
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Uses 6.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 131 km (81 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























