Car comparison

Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6vsMcLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maserati MCPURA Cielo

3.0 V6

630 hp3000 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboRoadster2025-present
VS

McLaren 750S Spider

4.0 V8

750 hp3994 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboRoadster2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    340 km/h
    211 mph Unrestricted
    320 km/h
    199 mph Restricted
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.7 L/100 km
    20.1 mpg US
    24.1 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    100 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    95/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    25/100

McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Most powerful
    750 hp
    559 kW
  • Highest torque
    800 Nm
    590 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,438 kg
    3,170 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    522 hp/t
    389 kW/t
    1.9 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    590 km
    367 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
Power
630hp470kW
750hp559kW
Torque
730Nm538lb-ft
800Nm590lb-ft
Curb weight
1,560kg3,439lb
1,438kg3,170lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Calculated
332 km/h
206 mph
To 99% top speed
41.7s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph
Calculated
37.3s99% target: 329 km/h / 204 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.9s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
7.6s
Calculated
7.3s
0-60 mph
2.8s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.2s
Calculated
10.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
404hp/t301kW/t183hp/1000 lb
Calculated
522hp/t389kW/t237hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
468Nm/t313lb-ft/ton
Calculated
556Nm/t372lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
513km319mi
Calculated
590km367mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,000cc183cu in
3,994cc244cu in
Length
4,667mm184in
4,569mm180in
Width
1,965mm77in
1,930mm76in
Height
1,214mm48in
1,196mm47in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,680mm66in
Rear track
1,648mm65in
1,629mm64in
Trunk volume
100L
58L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
60L
72L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V67,500 rpm3,000-5,500 rpm7,750 rpm
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V87,500 rpm5,500 rpm7,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.8 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.9 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
7.6 s
7.3 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
26.1 s
28.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Likely limited
332 km/h
206 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.6 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.6 s
8.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.2 s
10.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
235 km/h
146 mph
238 km/h
148 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6
630 hp
470 kW
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
750 hp
559 kW

McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 has 120 hp more than Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6 and McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8: 120 hp (89 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6
730 Nm
538 lb-ft
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
1,438 kg
3,170 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
332 km/h
206 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V62.9 s
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V82.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 and Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6 and McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6
404 hp/t
301 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
522 hp/t
389 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6
513 km
319 mi
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
590 km
367 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6
630 hp
470 kW
2.9 s
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
750 hp
559 kW
2.8 s
332 km/h
206 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
100 L
3.5 cu ft
Length
4,667 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,214 mm
47.8 in
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
Power
750 hp
559 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
332 km/h
206 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
58 L
2.0 cu ft
Length
4,569 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,196 mm
47.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
Power
750 hp
559 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
332 km/h
206 mph
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK

Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
2.9 s
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6
404 hp/t
301 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
522 hp/t
389 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8
Power
630 hp
470 kW
750 hp
559 kW
Torque
730 Nm
538 lb-ft
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.9 s
2.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
340 km/h211 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
332 km/h
206 mph
Lightness
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
1,438 kg
3,170 lb
Fuel consumption
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
100 L
3.5 cu ft
Length
4,667 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,214 mm
47.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
58 L
2.0 cu ft
Length
4,569 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,196 mm
47.1 in
Range score
513 km
319 mi
590 km
367 mi
Trunk score
100 L
3.5 cu ft
58 L
2.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
404 hp/t
301 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
522 hp/t
389 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8
Consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.47 LC100 km21.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.95 LC100 mi34.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,071 LC/year3,203 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6

  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 42 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8

  • Has 120 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 122 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 118 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 77 km (48 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6vsMaseratiMCPURA3.0 V6
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8vsMcLaren750S4.0 V8
3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6vsMaseratiMC20 Cielo3.0 V6
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8
3.0 V6
4.0 V8
VS
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6vsAston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8vsMcLaren720S Spider4.0 V8
3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6vsMcLarenArtura Spider3.0 V6
3.0 V6
5.2 V12
VS
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6vsAston MartinV12 Vantage Roadster5.2 V12
4.0 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8vsMcLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8
3.0 V6
3.8 V8
VS
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6vsMcLaren600LT Spider3.8 V8
3.0 V6
AMG SL 63 V8
VS
MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6vsMercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
4.0 V8
6.5 V12
VS
McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8vsLamborghiniAventador LP 780-4 Ultimae Roadster6.5 V12
Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6 vs McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster