Maserati GranTurismo I
Car comparison
Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Most powerful462 hp345 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions216 g/km
- Best estimated range699 km434 mi
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score82/100
Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8
- Fastest top speed310 km/h193 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Best overall score72/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460hp343kW | 462hp345kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.4s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated | 59.2s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.4s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 245hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 555km345mi Calculated | 699km434mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,881mm192in | 4,546mm179in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | 1,939mm76in |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,288mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,942mm116in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,651mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 98mm4in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 360g/km | 216g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.4 s | 11.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 462 hp 345 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 has 2 hp more than Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 304 km/h 189 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8: 6.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 245 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 555 km 345 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 699 km 434 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 462 hp 345 kW | 4.0 s | 304 km/h 189 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 |
| 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | 245 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranTurismo ISport 4.7 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp 343 kW | 462 hp 345 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 304 km/h 189 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.5 L/100 km 15.2 mpg US 18.2 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 555 km 345 mi | 699 km 434 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 360 g/km | 216 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 245 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8 | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.5 L/100 km15.2 mpg US18.2 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.13 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.65 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,325 L614 US gal511 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,069 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranTurismo I Sport 4.7 V8
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 265 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 6.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 144 km (90 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 144 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























