Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295)
EQE 350 98 kWh
292 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2023-2025
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWhvsLynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Lynk & Co Z10
95 kWh
272 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSedan2024-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque765 Nm564 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score0/100
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
- Lightest2,275 kg5,016 lb
- Largest trunk616 L
- Best practicality score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292hp218kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 765Nm564lb-ft | 343Nm253lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,435kg5,368lb | 2,275kg5,016lb |
| Gross weight | 2,980kg6,570lb | 2,669kg5,884lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 58.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.2s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 151Nm/t101lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,946mm195in | 5,028mm198in |
| Width | 1,961mm77in | 1,966mm77in |
| Height | 1,510mm59in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,120mm123in | 3,005mm118in |
| Front track | 1,632mm64in | 1,703mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | 1,713mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 129mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 616L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.2 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 272 hp 203 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh has 20 hp more than Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | 765 Nm 564 lb-ft |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 343 Nm 253 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | 2,435 kg 5,368 lb |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | 6.3 s |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp 218 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 765 Nm 564 lb-ft | 343 Nm 253 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,435 kg 5,368 lb | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 616 L 21.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 422 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Has 186 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)S 450e
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 300 100 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsBMW7 Series (G70)735i
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsTeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 202360 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 300d
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022330i
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)Facelift 2026S 350d
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 400e
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsBMW5 Series Sedan (G60)530i