Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300dvsLynk & Co Z10 71 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)

C 300d

265 hp1993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2021-2026
VS

Lynk & Co Z10

71 kWh

272 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSedan2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,780 kg
    3,924 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300dLynk & CoZ1071 kWh
Power
265hp198kW
272hp203kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
343Nm253lb-ft
Curb weight
1,780kg3,924lb
2,098kg4,625lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,518kg5,551lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
58.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
56.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
18.2s
Calculated
26.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton
Calculated
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,245km774mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,993cc122cu in
-
Length
4,751mm187in
5,028mm198in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,966mm77in
Height
1,438mm57in
1,468mm58in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
3,005mm118in
Front track
1,582mm62in
1,703mm67in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,713mm67in
Ground clearance-
129mm5in
Trunk volume
455L
616L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300dLynk & CoZ1071 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.2 s
26.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
175 km/h
109 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d
265 hp
198 kW
Lynk & CoZ1071 kWh
272 hp
203 kW

Lynk & Co Z10 71 kWh has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d and Lynk & Co Z10 71 kWh: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Lynk & CoZ1071 kWh
343 Nm
253 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d
1,780 kg
3,924 lb
Lynk & CoZ1071 kWh
2,098 kg
4,625 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lynk & CoZ1071 kWh
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d5.9 s
Lynk & CoZ1071 kWh6.8 s

Although Lynk & Co Z10 71 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d and Lynk & Co Z10 71 kWh: 0.9 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Lynk & CoZ1071 kWh
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d
265 hp
198 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lynk & CoZ1071 kWh
272 hp
203 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300d
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Lynk & CoZ1071 kWh
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,028 mm
198.0 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300dLynk & CoZ1071 kWh
Power
265 hp
198 kW
272 hp
203 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
343 Nm
253 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,780 kg
3,924 lb
2,098 kg
4,625 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,028 mm
198.0 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Range score
1,245 km
774 mi
-
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d

  • Has 207 Nm more
  • Is 318 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Lynk & Co Z10 71 kWh

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 161 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d
Lynk & Co Z10 71 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 300d vs Lynk & Co Z10 71 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster