Car comparison

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0TvsMercedes-Benz GLB (X244) GLB 250+ 85 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 900

EM-P 2.0T

254 hp1969 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2025-present
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X244)

GLB 250+ 85 kWh

272 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSUV2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
Power
254hp189kW
272hp203kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
335Nm247lb-ft
Curb weight
2,820kg6,217lb
2,125kg4,685lb
Gross weight-
2,700kg5,952lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
68.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
77.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.3s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
20.3s
Calculated
36.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.1s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.3mpg US38.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.7s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
90hp/t67kW/t41hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
124Nm/t83lb-ft/ton
Calculated
158Nm/t105lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
892km554mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
-
Length
5,240mm206in
4,732mm186in
Width
1,999mm79in
1,861mm73in
Height
1,810mm71in
1,687mm66in
Wheelbase
3,160mm124in
2,889mm114in
Front track
1,722mm68in
-
Rear track
1,724mm68in
-
Ground clearance
194mm8in
-
Trunk volume
281L
540L
Max trunk volume
1,050L
1,715L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
65L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.1 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.3 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.3 s
36.5 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.6 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.7 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
171 km/h
106 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
272 hp
203 kW

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X244) GLB 250+ 85 kWh has 18 hp more than Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X244) GLB 250+ 85 kWh: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
335 Nm
247 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
2,820 kg
6,217 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
2,125 kg
4,685 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
240 km/h
149 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T4.3 s
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh7.4 s

Although Mercedes-Benz GLB (X244) GLB 250+ 85 kWh has more power, Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X244) GLB 250+ 85 kWh: 3.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
254 hp
189 kW
4.3 s
240 km/h
149 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
272 hp
203 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
281 L
9.9 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,732 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
Power
254 hp
189 kW
272 hp
203 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
335 Nm
247 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.3 s
7.4 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,820 kg
6,217 lb
2,125 kg
4,685 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.3 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
281 L
9.9 cu ft
Length
5,240 mm
206.3 in
Height
1,810 mm
71.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,732 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Range score
892 km
554 mi
-
Trunk score
281 L
9.9 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
90 hp/t
67 kW/t
11.1 kg/hp
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.3 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.76 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,094 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 3.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X244) GLB 250+ 85 kWh

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Is 695 kg lighter
  • Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 259 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X244) GLB 250+ 85 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

EM-P 2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
GLB 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
EM-P 2.0T
2.0
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
GLB 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250
EM-P 2.0T
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
GLS 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2023GLS 350d
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
GLS 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
EM-P 2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
GLS 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2026GLS 350d
EM-P 2.0T
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
Lynk & Co900EM-P 2.0TvsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
Lynk & Co 900 EM-P 2.0T vs Mercedes-Benz GLB (X244) GLB 250+ 85 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster