Lynk & Co 05 · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 05 · Facelift 2023 + 2.0TD T5 EvovsVolkswagen Teramont X · Facelift 2023 530 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont X · Facelift 2023
530 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 05 Facelift 2023 + 2.0TD T5 Evo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,798 kg3,964 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score84/100
Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6
- Most powerful299 hp223 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best estimated range722 km448 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 299hp223kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,798kg3,964lb | 2,140kg4,718lb |
| Gross weight | 2,173kg4,791lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 92.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 95.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.7s Calculated | 46.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | 722km448mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,492cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,614mm182in | 4,917mm194in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,628mm64in | 1,729mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,734mm108in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | 1,593mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,618mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 336L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,070L | 1,719L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 05 Facelift 2023 + 2.0TD T5 Evo: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,750-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.7 s | 46.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 265 hp 198 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 299 hp 223 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6 has 34 hp more than Lynk & Co 05 Facelift 2023 + 2.0TD T5 Evo.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 05 Facelift 2023 + 2.0TD T5 Evo and Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 1,798 kg 3,964 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 2,140 kg 4,718 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 6.5 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 7.2 s |
Although Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6 has more power, Lynk & Co 05 Facelift 2023 + 2.0TD T5 Evo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 05 Facelift 2023 + 2.0TD T5 Evo and Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 05 Facelift 2023 + 2.0TD T5 Evo and Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 647 km 402 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 722 km 448 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 299 hp 223 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 05 Facelift 2023 + 2.0TD T5 Evo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co05Facelift 2023+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | VolkswagenTeramont XFacelift 2023530 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 299 hp 223 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,798 kg 3,964 lb | 2,140 kg 4,718 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | 722 km 448 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 336 L 11.9 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 05 Facelift 2023 + 2.0TD T5 Evo | Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 05 Facelift 2023 + 2.0TD T5 Evo
- Is 342 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Teramont X Facelift 2023 530 V6
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 75 km (46 mi) more estimated range
- Has 204 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























