Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300dvsLynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 05
+ 2.0TD T5 Evo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed249 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful269 hp201 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,016 km632 mi
- Largest trunk545 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo
- Lightest1,798 kg3,964 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 269hp201kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 1,798kg3,964lb |
| Gross weight | 2,570kg5,666lb | 2,173kg4,791lb |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 106.1s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 92.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.0s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,016km632mi Calculated | 659km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,769mm188in | 4,614mm182in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,606mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,888mm114in | 2,734mm108in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,593mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 158mm6in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 545L | 336L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,490L | 1,070L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 54L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300d: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,200 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.0 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | 269 hp 201 kW |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 265 hp 198 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300d has 4 hp more than Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300d: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | 2,045 kg 4,508 lb |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 1,798 kg 3,964 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | 6.4 s |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300d and Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300d and Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | 1,016 km 632 mi |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 659 km 409 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | 269 hp 201 kW | 6.4 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300d | Lynk & Co05+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 269 hp 201 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,045 kg 4,508 lb | 1,798 kg 3,964 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,016 km 632 mi | 659 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | 336 L 11.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300d | Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 300d
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 358 km (222 mi) more estimated range
- Has 209 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Lynk & Co 05 + 2.0TD T5 Evo
- Is 247 kg lighter
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























