Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200vsLynk & Co 03 1.5TD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03
1.5TD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,385 kg3,053 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque265 Nm195 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Best estimated range806 km501 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | Lynk & Co031.5TD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,385kg3,053lb | 1,512kg3,333lb |
| Gross weight | 1,915kg4,222lb | 1,887kg4,160lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 59.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.6s Calculated | 47.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 796km495mi Calculated | 806km501mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,332cc81cu in | 1,477cc90cu in |
| Length | 4,549mm179in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,446mm57in | 1,472mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,597mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 414L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 124g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,620 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | Lynk & Co031.5TD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.6 s | 47.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD | 180 hp 134 kW |
Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD has 17 hp more than Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200 and Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 8.1 s |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD and Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200 and Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 796 km 495 mi |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD | 806 km 501 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co031.5TD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co031.5TD |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 200 | Lynk & Co031.5TD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 796 km 495 mi | 806 km 501 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 124 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200 | Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz A-class Sedan (V177) A 200
- Is 127 kg lighter
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 km (6 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























