Lynk & Co 03
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD · Stage 3vsLynk & Co 03 1.5TD · Stage 2vsLynk & Co 03 1.5TD · Stage 1vsLynk & Co 03 1.5TD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03
1.5TD (Stage 2)
Lynk & Co 03
1.5TD (Stage 1)
Lynk & Co 03
1.5TD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful270 hp201 kW
- Highest torque411 Nm303 lb-ft
- Lightest1,512 kg3,333 lb
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t133 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range806 km501 mi
- Largest trunk414 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 270hp201kW+90 hp | 234hp174kW+54 hp | 212hp158kW+32 hp | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 411Nm303lb-ft+146 Nm | 358Nm264lb-ft+93 Nm | 323Nm238lb-ft+58 Nm | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,512kg3,333lb | 1,512kg3,333lb | 1,512kg3,333lb | 1,512kg3,333lb |
| Gross weight | 1,887kg4,160lb | 1,887kg4,160lb | 1,887kg4,160lb | 1,887kg4,160lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 224 km/h 139 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.6s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph-1.8 s Calculated | 61.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph+2.4 s Calculated | 59.3s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph-0.2 s Calculated | 59.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s-1.8 s | 6.7s-1.2 s | 7.1s-0.8 s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.1s-28.4 s Calculated | 22.3s-25.2 s Calculated | 28.1s-19.4 s Calculated | 47.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s-1.6 s Calculated | 6.4s-1.1 s Calculated | 6.8s-0.7 s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s-1.7 s Calculated | 14.6s-1.1 s Calculated | 15.1s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 806km501mi Calculated | 806km501mi Calculated | 806km501mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,477cc90cu in | 1,477cc90cu in | 1,477cc90cu in | 1,477cc90cu in |
| Length | 4,657mm183in | 4,657mm183in | 4,657mm183in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,840mm72in | 1,840mm72in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,472mm58in | 1,472mm58in | 1,472mm58in | 1,472mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,730mm107in | 2,730mm107in | 2,730mm107in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,597mm63in | 1,597mm63in | 1,597mm63in | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,597mm63in | 1,597mm63in | 1,597mm63in | 1,597mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 147mm6in | 147mm6in | 147mm6in | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 414L | 414L | 414L | 414L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 2) 234 hp: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 1) 212 hp: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD 180 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.4 s | 6.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.7 s | 7.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.1 s | 22.3 s | 28.1 s | 47.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 224 km/h 139 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.4 s | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.6 s | 15.1 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | 270 hp 201 kW |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | 234 hp 174 kW |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | 212 hp 158 kW |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | 180 hp 134 kW |
Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp has 90 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD 180 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD 180 hp and Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp: 90 hp (67 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | 358 Nm 264 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | 6.1 s |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | 6.7 s |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | 7.1 s |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp and Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD 180 hp: 1.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 2) 234 hp and Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 1) 212 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | 806 km 501 mi |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | 806 km 501 mi |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | 806 km 501 mi |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | 806 km 501 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | 270 hp 201 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | 234 hp 174 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | 212 hp 158 kW | 7.1 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 3)270 hp | Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 2)234 hp | Lynk & Co031.5TD (Stage 1)212 hp | Lynk & Co031.5TD180 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 270 hp 201 kW | 234 hp 174 kW | 212 hp 158 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | 358 Nm 264 lb-ft | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.7 s | 7.1 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 806 km 501 mi | 806 km 501 mi | 806 km 501 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp | Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 2) 234 hp | Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 1) 212 hp | Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD 180 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 3) 270 hp
- Has 36 hp more
- Has 53 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Lynk & Co 03 1.5TD (Stage 2) 234 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























