Lotus Theory 1
Car comparison
Lotus Theory 1 70 kWhvsNIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonComparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Theory 1 70 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score0/100
NIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric
- Most powerful1,360 hp1,014 kW
- Best power-to-weight784 hp/t585 kW/t1.3 kg/hp
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusTheory 170 kWh | NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,000hp746kW | 1,360hp1,014kW |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 313 km/h194 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 31.6s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 36.2s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s | 2.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 6.4s Calculated | 7.1s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s Calculated | 2.6s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 9.5s Calculated | 9.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 625hp/t466kW/t283hp/1000 lb Calculated | 784hp/t585kW/t356hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Length | 4,490mm177in | 4,888mm192in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 2,230mm88in |
| Height | 1,140mm45in | 1,150mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | - |
| Front track | 1,720mm68in | - |
| Rear track | 1,700mm67in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusTheory 170 kWh | NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 6.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 22.3 s | 29.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 313 km/h194 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.5 s | 9.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 250 km/h 155 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusTheory 170 kWh | 1,000 hp 746 kW |
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | 1,360 hp 1,014 kW |
NIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric has 360 hp more than Lotus Theory 1 70 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Theory 1 70 kWh and NIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric: 360 hp (268 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusTheory 170 kWh | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusTheory 170 kWh | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 313 km/h194 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusTheory 170 kWh | 2.5 s |
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | 2.7 s |
Although NIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric has more power, Lotus Theory 1 70 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Theory 1 70 kWh and NIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusTheory 170 kWh | 625 hp/t 466 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp |
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | 784 hp/t 585 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusTheory 170 kWh | 1,000 hp 746 kW | 2.5 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | 1,360 hp 1,014 kW | 2.7 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 313 km/h194 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusTheory 170 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusTheory 170 kWh | NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,000 hp 746 kW | 1,360 hp 1,014 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 2.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 313 km/h194 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 625 hp/t 466 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp | 784 hp/t 585 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Theory 1 70 kWh
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
NIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric
- Has 360 hp more
- Has 159 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























